|
Post by iblue on Mar 22, 2015 0:31:46 GMT 1
Gills boss upset about penalty decisions and Colchester boss upset that he didn't win - story now on GillsConnect tinyurl.com/lvlrblz
|
|
|
Post by muppet on Mar 22, 2015 10:21:24 GMT 1
Fair result and both need to be upset about their respective teams performances rather than the odd decision or two.
|
|
|
Post by gillsjan on Mar 22, 2015 10:34:40 GMT 1
Rainham End guys should McGlashan have had a penalty?
|
|
|
Post by muppet on Mar 22, 2015 10:37:40 GMT 1
I felt it was, but also felt it was one of those where he could have stayed up and possibly gone on to score.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2015 10:54:06 GMT 1
From the Medway stand more or less opposite the McGlashan incident, could not be dead certain but thought it was,how ever there was definitely a hand ball that was allowed to pass by. As for their managers comment on where the extra mins came from, could it be the time wasting by their keeper? who wandered around the goal area looking for somewhere to place the ball of course the guy who was booked for wasting time had nothing to do with it I suppose.
|
|
|
Post by terryjolleysboot on Mar 22, 2015 13:59:20 GMT 1
Definately not a pen I just wish McGlashen had tried as hard to score as he did for the penalty. Regarding the added time the Colchester time wasting merited it!
|
|
|
Post by technical on Mar 22, 2015 15:09:43 GMT 1
That's how i felt tjb. It might have been a penalty but probably not and the best opportunity was the one wasted by going down for the pen when he could have stayed up and scored.
Agree with muppet, ref could have been better but his performance wasn't as bad as either team
|
|